History, asked by pradeepprajapati5678, 4 months ago

The condition of a farmer was better than a slave because:
(a) A farmer got a portion of the crops he produced
(b) A slave gave his labour but did not get anything in exchange
(
(c) A slave was the property of his master who was the slave-owner
(d) A farmer was not engaged in domestic purposes
(​

Answers

Answered by utkarshchaurasiya824
0

Explanation:

a slave gave his labour but did not get anything in exchange

Answered by subhranshupattanayak
0

Answer:

ans is option C a slave was the property of his master who was the slave owner

Similar questions