Question

The judiciary in India is independent.Do you agree?state the argument in support and against th statement.​

Answer 1

When the Constitution of India was setup, highest priority was given to the independence of Indian judiciary.

Oath has to be taken by all the judges before taking seat.

The judges of different level courts are appointed by different procedures.

Activities of judges can be discussed by the legislature.

Retired judges of Supreme Court cannot engage in other practices but High Court judges can.

Though the level of Mal practice in Indian judiciary is still not clear but the reasons can be sighted as :-

Some judges take money n return for their wrong decisions.

The ministers can manipulate the judges by threatening them about their personal life.

MARK AS BRAIN LIST PLEASE

Answer 2

$\underline{\Huge\mathfrak{Question-}}$

The judiciary in India is independent. Do you agree? State the argument in support and against the statement.

$\underline{\Huge\mathfrak{Answer}}$....✍️

1 => The Indian Judiciary consists of a Supreme Court for the entire nation, High courts in the States, District courts and other courts at local level.

2=> In India, Supreme Court controls judicial administration and its decisions bind all other courts in the country. It can take up any dispute between citizens of the country, between citizens and government, between two or more State governments, etc.

3=> It is the highest court of appeal in civil and criminal cases. Independence of the Judiciary means that it is not under the control of legislature or executive.

4=> The Judges do not act on the direction of the government or according to the wishes of ruling party. That is why all modern democracies have courts that are independent of legislature and executive.

5=> The Supreme Court and High courts have the power to interpret the Constitution of a country. They can declare invalid any law of the legislature or actions of executive, if they find such a law is against the Constitution and this is termed asjudicial review.

6=> The Supreme Court of India has also ruled that the basic principles of the constitution cannot be changed by the Parliament.

7=> Thus,the powers and the independence of Indian Judiciary allow it to act as guardian of Fundamental Rights.

#BeBrainly ..♥️