The mean diameter of a thin brass rod is to be measured by vernier calipers. Why is a set of of of 100 measurements of the diameter expected to yield a more reliable estimate than a set of 5 measurements only.
Answers
Answered by
23
Hii dear,
# Reason-
On a vernier calliper, taking 100 readings is more reliable estimate than taking 5 readings because it minimizes personal and random errors in the measurement.
# Extra information-
1. Random error is an error in measurement caused by factors which vary from one measurement to another.
2. Personal error comes into existence due to making an error in reading a scale. It's type of systematic error.
Hope you understand well...
# Reason-
On a vernier calliper, taking 100 readings is more reliable estimate than taking 5 readings because it minimizes personal and random errors in the measurement.
# Extra information-
1. Random error is an error in measurement caused by factors which vary from one measurement to another.
2. Personal error comes into existence due to making an error in reading a scale. It's type of systematic error.
Hope you understand well...
Answered by
2
Answer:
it is due to the reason that random error involved in the mean value of 100 observation is much less than that involved in the mean value of 5 observation
Similar questions
English,
7 months ago
Biology,
7 months ago
Hindi,
1 year ago
CBSE BOARD X,
1 year ago
Math,
1 year ago