The modern industrialisation could not marginalised the traditional industries in England justify the statement with any five suitable argument
Answers
*People thought that handmade cloth is the best finishing cloth then machines.
*machines were very expensive that's why the factories did not want to invest his capital on machines. the muscles of 10 broke down and repairing cost was very expensive
* seasonality, Mini Industries demand of labour was seasonal
* less than 20% of the total worker was him blood in technically advanced industrial sector hence measure amount of worker is working in traditional industries
* they did not want to introduce machine that got rid of human labour and required large capital investment.
Answer:
The modern industrialisation could not marginalise the traditional industries in England because of the following reasons.
(a) The new industries could not easily displace traditional industries. By the end of 19th century itself, less than 20% of total workforce was employed in advanced technological industrial centres. Textile industry itself produced a large portion of its output not within the factories, but outside, in domestic units.
(b) In non-mechanised sectors such as food processing, building, pottery, glass work, tanning furniture making and production of implements, ordinary and small innovations were the basis of their growth.
(c) Technological changes were not accepted readily by the industrialists. Their growth was slow as new technology was expensive and often broke down and repairs were costly.
(d) The aristocratic class preferred hand-made items as it defined class and status.
(e) The traditional craftsmen and labour and not a machine operator, was still more popular. Handmade things were popular, as machines produced mass designs and there was no variety. For example, human skill produced 45 kinds of axes and 500 varieties of hammers, which no machine could produce.