Question

The Supreme Court and the High Courts in India settle disputes arising out of governmental

decisions. Some persons and associations opposed to this order filed a number of cases in the

courts. They appealed to the courts to declare the order invalid and stop its implementation.

The Supreme Court of India bunched all these cases together. This case was known as the

‘Indira Sawhney and others Vs Union of India case’. Eleven judges of the Supreme Court heard

arguments of both sides. By a majority, the Supreme Court judges in 1992 declared that this

order of the Government of India was valid. At the same time the Supreme Court asked the

government to modify its original order. It said that well-to do persons among the backward

classes should be excluded from getting the benefit of reservation. Accordingly, the

Department of Which institutions are at work in the running of your school? Would it be better

if one person alone took all the decisions regarding management of your school? Personnel and

Training issued another Office Memorandum on 8 September 1993. The dispute thus came to

an end and this policy has been followed since then.


A) Who finalized the policy of providing reservation?

1. High court 2. Supreme court 3. 11 advocates 4.Personal and training

department


B) Why was the case called as “Indira Sawhney and others vs Union of India case”

1. Because 11 judges heard the case


2. It was between supreme court and High court.


3. It was between actual case and an appeal for an invalid case.​

Answer 1

Answer:

Here is your answer mate

Explanation:

It was between actual case and an appeal for an invalid case..

Hope it helps you..