Social Sciences, asked by mallu123, 10 months ago

those who signed subsidiary alliance were the pupet in the hands of the British of east indian company​

Answers

Answered by vike2
58

Answer:

Yes.Because those rulers had to provide millitary assistance whenever the East India company needed assistance.Moreover,British troops were stationed in their empire which was in fact said to provide protection to the rulers but the truth was that they were stationed to control the empire and those stationed troops had to be maintained out of the rulers treasury.

Answered by soujanyanaik143
46

Explanation:

those who signed subsidiary Alliance were the Puppet in the hands of the British East India company because they had to keep the British army in their Kingdom and had to bear the expenses of the army and wages of soldiers and also having a British resident in his court and permission to appoint Europeans and also permission to sign agreement of act

HOPE THIS ANSWER HELPED YOU. PLEASE MARK AS BRAINLY☺

Similar questions