Trace the growth of democracy give answer of this question
Answers
Answer:
The word ‘Democracy’ is a term that has evolved its meaning in a gamut of versions in different parts of the country. Depending on the needs and circumstances that have prevailed in various countries over the period of time, democracy as a concept has shaped itself accordingly. This whole process makes it difficult to derive a common definition of the term ‘Democracy’. Democracy may be a state of exuberance for one and a state of tolerance for the other. In the light of these conflicting views for the same term, it becomes imperative to track down the history associated with the concept ‘Democracy’ and analyze its growth and evolution in different parts of the world so as to make a comparative analysis of its essential feature, importance, limitations, and future prospects, for better understanding of the subject.
This project would deal with various facets that have resulted in the growth of Democracy into diversified field. An analogy can be drawn wherein different ways in which democracy has evolved can be compared to the concurrent judgments made by a judge in a judgment; which involves reaching the same conclusion by discerning adoption of reasons to prove the same. The analysis of the concept of democracy and its historical evolution on the basis of different approaches and schools of thought would be dealt in Part I of the project. This demand for further description on the analysis of the concept of Democracy in different countries, and the same would be dealt extensively in Part II of the project. Further, a discrepancy arises when there evolves a difference in what the concept ‘Democracy’ was actually meant to be perceived and the way it is followed now, i.e. many features associated with democracy on papers may lack similarity with what it is in practice. The critical analysis of such discrepancy would be dealt in the Part III of the project.
Part IV of the project would reiterate the comparison of Democracy with other form of the government to elucidate the pros and cons related to democracy as compared to others. On the basis of the critical analysis of the growth of ‘Democracy’, various problems related to effective implementations and lack of good governance associated with the aforementioned term would be in the project. Part V of the project would provide a brief understanding of how the term has evolved over a period of time by providing a detailed conclusion of various aspects dealt in the project and would contain researchers’ understanding of the topic.
GROWTH OF DEMOCRACY THROUGH HISTORICAL TIMES
Ancient Greek
The origin of the concept ‘Democracy’ can be traced back to the old Greek city states which have enjoyed complete local autonomy. They experimented with different forms of government like Aristocracy, Monarchy, Tyranny, Oligarchy and Democracy. After views various forms of government, Aristotle gave his favour in the favour of policy or a moderate form of government. The type of Democracy that prevailed in these states was pure or a direct democracy wherein all the freemen met together in general assemblies and passed laws and executed them received ambassador and acted as jurymen.[vi] This type of democracy was revived in medieval times by Italian city states. The Forrest Cannons of Switzerland also had a direct democracy which has come down to modern times. Rousseau, in the eighteenth century, deprecated indirect or representative democracy on the large scale under modern conditions.[vii] But, he even advocated the fact that pure democracy presupposes many difficult things to combine. He presupposes 1) a small state, in which people may be easily assembled, and in which every citizen can easily know all the rest, 2) considerable equality in rank and fortune, 3) great simplicity on matters, and 4) little or no luxury.
Athens was the first city state to allow ordinary citizens access to government offices and courts. In theory, all Athenian citizens were eligible to speak and vote in the Assembly which set the laws of the city-state. In reality, Athens was not a true democracy as women were not included nor were foreigners, slaves or freed slaves. Also, according to the rules of citizenship both parents must have been Athenian citizens for a person to qualify to take part in the Assembly. The democracy therefore, was only a very small minority of the people living in Athens. It was, however, the closest any country had come to establishing a democratic society at this time.
Explanation: