Triple Talaq practice related to Muslim women. ..
Is it justified morally/ legally /socially /traditionally?
Should there be a legislative act against it?
Give good reasons please. Don't copy paste from internet sources.
Answers
Answered by
30
Heya Sir!
Definitely, triple talaq is not justified from any of the aspect (moral, legal, social or traditional). Just like what "Sati Pratha" was in Hinduism, a complete exploitation of Women, Triple Talaq is no less than it. Just saying Talaq three times, women's life is ruined. First, she would be socially discarded, second, she may not be able to marry again. Women are also human, they also have all the rights that men have. For a democratic country like India, which promotes women equality, triple talaq should have no place here.
Yes, as our Muslim brothers say that it's their culture and the government should not interfere in it. Then one may say that killing a human is my culture, government should not interfere. On a special day, looting other's wealth is our culture, government should not punish them! Is it justified? Yeah, if government prohibits celebrating Eid, then yes it's the fault of government but government has complete right of interference, wherever human rights are exploited. Triple Talaq does the same.
We have heard the case of Sabrimala Temple. There also women rights were exploited, but the Supreme Court provided fair judgement, however, still the locals are not satisfied with it.
Triple Talaq is banned in many countries, including the Muslim-majority countries, then what's the problem of banning it in India? I think that yes, a legislative act should be passed on it. Our constitution grants equal rights to every person. The divorce is granted in the case when both husband and wife are not happy with each other. When they don't want to live with each other. Triple Talaq is not in this way. So, in order to protect the rights of women and following the constitution, there should be a legislative act against it.
Definitely, triple talaq is not justified from any of the aspect (moral, legal, social or traditional). Just like what "Sati Pratha" was in Hinduism, a complete exploitation of Women, Triple Talaq is no less than it. Just saying Talaq three times, women's life is ruined. First, she would be socially discarded, second, she may not be able to marry again. Women are also human, they also have all the rights that men have. For a democratic country like India, which promotes women equality, triple talaq should have no place here.
Yes, as our Muslim brothers say that it's their culture and the government should not interfere in it. Then one may say that killing a human is my culture, government should not interfere. On a special day, looting other's wealth is our culture, government should not punish them! Is it justified? Yeah, if government prohibits celebrating Eid, then yes it's the fault of government but government has complete right of interference, wherever human rights are exploited. Triple Talaq does the same.
We have heard the case of Sabrimala Temple. There also women rights were exploited, but the Supreme Court provided fair judgement, however, still the locals are not satisfied with it.
Triple Talaq is banned in many countries, including the Muslim-majority countries, then what's the problem of banning it in India? I think that yes, a legislative act should be passed on it. Our constitution grants equal rights to every person. The divorce is granted in the case when both husband and wife are not happy with each other. When they don't want to live with each other. Triple Talaq is not in this way. So, in order to protect the rights of women and following the constitution, there should be a legislative act against it.
Steph0303:
Great Work !! All the facts are true :)
Answered by
3
HELLO SIR !!!!!!
Triple talaq is a form of divorce that was practised in India, whereby a Muslim man could legally divorce his wife by pronouncing talaq (the Arabic word for divorce) three times. The pronouncement could be oral or written, or, in recent times, delivered by electronic means such as telephone, SMS, email or social media.[citation needed] The man did not need to cite any cause for the divorce and the wife need not have been present at the time of pronouncement.[citation needed] After a period of iddat, during which it was ascertained whether the wife is pregnant, the divorce became irrevocable.In the recommended practice, a waiting period was required before each pronouncement of talaq, during which reconciliation was attempted. However, it had become common to make all three pronouncements in one sitting. While the practice was frowned upon, it was not prohibited.A divorced woman could not remarry her divorced husband unless she first married another man, a practice called nikah halala. Until she remarried, she retained the custody of male toddlers and prepubescent female children. Beyond those restrictions, the children came under the guardianship of the father.
Triple talaq is a 1,400 year-old practice among Sunni Muslims.It is "manifestly arbitrary" and allows a man to "break down marriage whimsically and capriciously”.
Triple talaq as a practice is not mentioned in the Quran or Sharia law. It is also largely disapproved by Muslim legal scholars. Several Islamic countries, including Pakistan and Bangladesh, have banned it, although it is technically legal in Sunni Islamic jurisprudence. Triple talaq, in Islamic law, is based upon the belief that the husband has the right to reject or dismiss his wife with good grounds.
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board(AIMPLB), a non-governmental organisation, had told the Supreme Court that women could also pronounce triple talaq, and could execute nikahnamas that stipulated conditions so that the husbands could not pronounce triple talaq According to AIMPLB, "Sharia grants right to divorce to husbands because men have greater power of decision-making."
Triple talaq is a form of divorce that was practised in India, whereby a Muslim man could legally divorce his wife by pronouncing talaq (the Arabic word for divorce) three times. The pronouncement could be oral or written, or, in recent times, delivered by electronic means such as telephone, SMS, email or social media.[citation needed] The man did not need to cite any cause for the divorce and the wife need not have been present at the time of pronouncement.[citation needed] After a period of iddat, during which it was ascertained whether the wife is pregnant, the divorce became irrevocable.In the recommended practice, a waiting period was required before each pronouncement of talaq, during which reconciliation was attempted. However, it had become common to make all three pronouncements in one sitting. While the practice was frowned upon, it was not prohibited.A divorced woman could not remarry her divorced husband unless she first married another man, a practice called nikah halala. Until she remarried, she retained the custody of male toddlers and prepubescent female children. Beyond those restrictions, the children came under the guardianship of the father.
Triple talaq is a 1,400 year-old practice among Sunni Muslims.It is "manifestly arbitrary" and allows a man to "break down marriage whimsically and capriciously”.
Triple talaq as a practice is not mentioned in the Quran or Sharia law. It is also largely disapproved by Muslim legal scholars. Several Islamic countries, including Pakistan and Bangladesh, have banned it, although it is technically legal in Sunni Islamic jurisprudence. Triple talaq, in Islamic law, is based upon the belief that the husband has the right to reject or dismiss his wife with good grounds.
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board(AIMPLB), a non-governmental organisation, had told the Supreme Court that women could also pronounce triple talaq, and could execute nikahnamas that stipulated conditions so that the husbands could not pronounce triple talaq According to AIMPLB, "Sharia grants right to divorce to husbands because men have greater power of decision-making."
Similar questions