Question

Under the company rule, the Indian rulers were not allowed to -



Go out of their states

have relations with foreign powers

Adopt an heir to the throne

Keep army

​

Answer 1

Answer:

According to the terms of this agreement, Indian rulers were not allowed to have their independent armed forces, but were to be protected by the Company. The local rulers also had to pay for the subsidiary forces that the Company promised to maintain for the purpose of their "protection".

your answer is option d (keep army)

Explanation:

pls mark brainliest

❤️jai shankar ❤️

RAY

Answer 2

Answer:

yes, Under the company rule, the Indian rulers were not allowed to -

• Under the company rule, the Indian rulers were not allowed to - Go out of their states
• Under the company rule, the Indian rulers were not allowed to - Go out of their stateshave relations with foreign powers
• Under the company rule, the Indian rulers were not allowed to - Go out of their stateshave relations with foreign powersAdopt an heir to the throne
• Under the company rule, the Indian rulers were not allowed to - Go out of their stateshave relations with foreign powersAdopt an heir to the throneKeep army

Under the company rule, the Indian rulers were not allowed to - Go out of their stateshave relations with foreign powersAdopt an heir to the throneKeep armyplzz mark me as brainlist.