Question

Wars were destructive by nature. Explain?

Answer 1

hii friend!

Various sub-disciplines have grappled with war's etiology, but each in turn, as with definitions of war, often reflects a tacit or explicit acceptance of broader philosophical issues on the nature of determinism and freedom. The problem with focusing on one single aspect of man's nature is that while the explanation of war's causation may be simplified, the simplification ignores cogent explanations put forward by competing theories. For example, an emphasis on man's reason as the cause of war is apt to ignore deep cultural structures that may perpetuate war in the face of the universal appeal to peace, and similarly may ignore inherited pugnacity in some individuals or even in some groups. Similarly, an emphasis on the biological etiology of war can ignore man's intellectual capacity to control, or his will to go against, his predispositions. In other words, human biology can affect thinking (what is thought, how, for what duration and intensity), and can accordingly affect cultural developments, and in turn cultural institutions can affect biological and rational developments

hope this helps =)

Answer 2

Hello!

<> Wars were destructive to nature explain.

Answer: Yes wars were destructive to nature because:-

》People used to use powerful bombs, chemicals of the bomb were settled on the ground which stoped the growth of plants.

》Even due to the bombs animals get hurt or even may die.

》Plants were harmed due to the chemicals in the air.

》The chemicals in the air caused air pollution.

<> There fore Wars were always destructive to nature.

Example: World war 2

♡Hope this helps♥♥♥