Computer Science, asked by hay1, 1 year ago

What are the adventage of RFID over bar code reader

Answers

Answered by Usernameisempty
3
barcodes often can get damaged/shaffed causing it to become unreadable by the scanner. barcodes can easily be duplicated/fabricated whereas RFID tech uses radio waves and each RFID chip emits a particular spectrum in response to the waves send by the electromagnetic reader. such chips require specific and uncommon technique to be duplicated . RFID is newer and better than barcode

Answered by hruthik2222
2
RFID tags can be read at much greater distances; an RFID reader can pull information from a tag at distances up to 300 feet. The range to read a barcode is much less, typically no more than fifteen feet.
RFID readers can interrogate, or read, RFID tags much faster; read rates of forty or more tags per second are possible. Reading barcodes is much more time-consuming; due to the fact that a direct line of sight is required, if the items are not properly oriented to the reader it may take seconds to read an individual tag. Barcode readers usually take a half-second or more to successfully complete a read.
Line of sight requirements also limit the ruggedness of barcodes as well as the reusability of barcodes. (Since line of sight is required for barcodes, the printed barcode must be exposed on the outside of the product, where it is subject to greater wear and tear.) RFID tags are typically more rugged, since the electronic components are better protected in a plastic cover. RFID tags can also be implanted within the product itself, guaranteeing greater ruggedness and reusability.
Barcodes have no read/write capability; that is, you cannot add to the information written on a printed barcode. RFID tags, however, can be read/write devices; the RFID reader can communicate with the tag, and alter as much of the information as the tag design will allow.
RFID tags are typically more expensive than barcodes, in some cases, much more so.
Similar questions