Question

what are the differences between rigit and flexible constitution on the basis of the amendment of the constitution​

Answer 1

A Rigid Constitution is the one in which amendment of the constitution is very difficult, although it is not impossible, but the process is too burdensome that it is almost impossible to amend changes in it. While a Flexible Constitution is the one in which amendments are easily done.

Explanation:

• In Flexible Constitution the is no distinction between the ordinary laws and the constitutional laws and amendments are possible in both of them.
• It is also easier to amend flexible constitution because no specific provisions are mentioned to amend it.
• It is helpful in adapting to the need of the hour and the needs of the people.
• Best example for Flexible Constitution is the Constitution of Great Britain.
• In Rigid Constitutions, which requires special provisions for the amendment process.
• The constitution is placed above the ordinary laws of the country, and it is very difficult to propose amendments in it.
• The best example is the Constitution of the United States.
• Although such types of constitution provides stability to the laws in the country it becomes outdated eventually.
• The Constitution of India is neither rigid nor too flexible because many of the provisions can be amended except for few.