What are the four aspects contained in the criterion
Answers
Answer:
I have explained the four aspects combined in design criterion
Explanation:
The theory should have a broad scope for design application, but should be able to deal with any topic
The theory might attach to an entire process or to part of the process, but it is important that a design theory deal with design, in the same way that a theory in physics deals with physical phenomena or theory in medicine refers to health. To put it another way, the proper subject of a design theory is design. If the subject were to be something else, like design outcomes, then there is no need for a special category of theories—those arising in other, non-generative disciplines will suffice. Some may object that all design theories are connected to design practice, but we felt this criterion should be included because theories exist that were not intended to do this. A classic example is the original formulation of General Design Theory39 where the designer is considered as having perfect knowledge in order to map 1:1—rather than a 1:many—from goals to features. The same is true in other fields, where underlying predictive models are not necessarily predicting something that is intended for practical use. An example is the model of Hilbert space in mathematics.
2. The theory should use propositions—if-then language—as a way of describing, explaining and predicting actual and existing aspects of designing and design success; however this is defined.
3. Where appropriate, the new theory should accept propositions and language contained in other design theories
In some disciplines, it is normal for one theory to compete with another since each theory suggests a way of understanding phenomena that may exclude other ways of understanding them. For instance, the earth either revolves around the sun or else the sun revolves around the earth. One theory precludes the other, and once one is established, there are a variety of implications that arise, both for having accepted it and also for having rejected others.
However, in other disciplines, particularly in the humanities and social sciences, it is possible for theories to co-exist, since the point is not to establish a single truth, but instead to produce multiple valid ways of understanding that can be applied to various objects of study. Arguably, this approach should also apply to design theories, since design is a phenomenon that is socially constructed. This multiplicity of understanding is characteristic of design, where the standard approach is not to suggest that there is one ideal design and the designer’s job is to find it. Instead, the designer typically recognizes that there is a wide range of possible ways to move from the current situation to a set of possible preferred situations. Designers and clients then choose among the preferred situations, depending on a variety of factors and the relative weight and impact of those factors.
Similarly, design theories that privilege one set of factors do not necessarily negate or replace design theories that privilege another set of factors. A design theory that models the factors that go into the design of a new piece of technical equipment, for example, does not necessarily need to accommodate the people who will be using the equipment. However, a design theory that models the political understanding surrounding that piece of equipment will need to include human, social, and cultural elements.
4. The theory should accommodate—or at least acknowledge—generative activity
Answer:
The four aspects are authority, accuracy, objectivity, and currency.
Explanation:
These are the four vital aspects that are contained in the criterion and meets and fulfills the context. This adequately shows the authoritative power and right, the accurate way of doing things, the motive and objectives towards solving ability, and the amount of the finances involved in the overall process.