what are the limitations that indian democracy suffers?
Answers
Answered by
3
Most countries in the world are democratic. The leaders are elected by masses for specified term.
India is the biggest democratic country in the world.
Yet it is still a developing country after many years of independence. While China is more developed than us with same time period of independence. This is because of few disadvantages of democratic rule.
Democracy is also responsible for wide spread of corruption. Due to democracy there is no single power who can control misbehavior of small leaders. The lower rank officer can defy his superior in-spite of being unfair in his job.
Hence forth all leader & officials try to steal the resources of the country and deceive people.
In countries which have one supreme power the extent of corruption is limited.
This is because the power to execute the bills or laws are present under that supreme person so those companies who intend to bribe will do it to the supreme power and his subordinates. Other officials also will be in his control and possibilities of misbehavior are limited.
But in democracy where there is no supreme power, the bribe is demanded by all the leaders.
So in one sense all leaders are ready to steal the resources of the country or state as they intend to be very rich.
The more the thieves the more the robbery and hence country becomes poor.
For this again prices are hiked to maintain budget of the government and again that money is misused. No one has the power to question and even if someone questions no one is there to answer. The leader try to abuse each other and the common man is tiered to see their drama.
If we considers kings rule like Aurangzeb, he levied heavy taxes on people. But this was not a problem as only the king was trying to be rich. Further he also tries to conquer other states and so his riches comprise from other lands as well. But in this case of democracy everyone tries to be a leader and when they get a chance they will try to be rich by corruption. So there are more number of people who are ready to rob the resources and cause trouble to people within the state.
In other way if we see there is no protection to common man. There is a sense of “no one cares for anyone” and lower rank officer will try to defy his superior as both of them are corrupt.
This does not mean communism is better but the freedom given by democracy should not vested to safe guard from self misbehavior
India is the biggest democratic country in the world.
Yet it is still a developing country after many years of independence. While China is more developed than us with same time period of independence. This is because of few disadvantages of democratic rule.
Democracy is also responsible for wide spread of corruption. Due to democracy there is no single power who can control misbehavior of small leaders. The lower rank officer can defy his superior in-spite of being unfair in his job.
Hence forth all leader & officials try to steal the resources of the country and deceive people.
In countries which have one supreme power the extent of corruption is limited.
This is because the power to execute the bills or laws are present under that supreme person so those companies who intend to bribe will do it to the supreme power and his subordinates. Other officials also will be in his control and possibilities of misbehavior are limited.
But in democracy where there is no supreme power, the bribe is demanded by all the leaders.
So in one sense all leaders are ready to steal the resources of the country or state as they intend to be very rich.
The more the thieves the more the robbery and hence country becomes poor.
For this again prices are hiked to maintain budget of the government and again that money is misused. No one has the power to question and even if someone questions no one is there to answer. The leader try to abuse each other and the common man is tiered to see their drama.
If we considers kings rule like Aurangzeb, he levied heavy taxes on people. But this was not a problem as only the king was trying to be rich. Further he also tries to conquer other states and so his riches comprise from other lands as well. But in this case of democracy everyone tries to be a leader and when they get a chance they will try to be rich by corruption. So there are more number of people who are ready to rob the resources and cause trouble to people within the state.
In other way if we see there is no protection to common man. There is a sense of “no one cares for anyone” and lower rank officer will try to defy his superior as both of them are corrupt.
This does not mean communism is better but the freedom given by democracy should not vested to safe guard from self misbehavior
Answered by
2
Every coin has two faces. In the same way, democracy also has disadvantages of its own. India has parliamentary form of democracy. In this system, the power is not concentrated in one hand only but its actually distributed or shared by several other leaders. therefore making a corrupt society as there is no superior power to supervise them. Democracy in india is covered by dirty political games. Politics in india has wasted a lot of money which could be used in human and resource development. People spent crores in promoting their party. In india due to democracy only some good decisions are delayed.
Similar questions