What are the pros and cons of veto power of the permanent members in the UN Security Council?
Answers
Explanation:
Pro
It requires a general consensus to be built amongst the status quo powers: That each of the permanent members has a veto power means that none of them can high-jack the UN for themselves, and it means that, in the end, nearly every resolution is a result of compromise. And that's not a bad thing, given the diverse interests that exist in the world and the stakes involved in many of these things. It means that the end result doesn't tend to be extreme, that it's something that an overwhelming majority of countries can accept, and that it's much more likely that they'll go along with it.
What are the pros and cons of the veto power wielded by the Security Council's permanent members?
How realistic is getting rich in investing?
This answer will shock you. It isn’t just realistic. 100% of people have gotten rich from investing if they: * Started investing earl
This is one of those somewhat tricky questions because nearly every "pro" can also be considered a "con" depending on your frame of reference.
Pro
It requires a general consensus to be built amongst the status quo powers: That each of the permanent members has a veto power means that none of them can high-jack the UN for themselves, and it means that, in the end, nearly every resolution is a result of compromise. And that's not a bad thing, given the diverse interests that exist in the world and the stakes involved in many of these things. It means that the end result doesn't tend to be extreme, that it's something that an overwhelming majority of countries can accept, and that it's much more likely that they'll go along with it.
Con
It requires a general consensus to be built amongst the status quo powers: That each of the permanent members has a veto power means that five countries-- three of whom are, at any moment, fundamentally in opposition to each other-- have to agree to stuff before it can happen. This is an absolutely insane bar to pass and it ends up leading to a lot of controversial/contested issues being kicked down the road for "Future Security Council" to deal with, if they aren't just, for all intents and purposes, ignored.[1]