Geography, asked by Swetlani3814, 1 year ago

What has been the effect of erosion in the ural mountains? erosion has created more passable areas through the mountains. erosion has had no effect on the mountains. erosion has exposed many valuable minerals. erosion has reduced the natural deposits of iron and coal?

Answers

Answered by arshikhan8123
0

Answer:

Erosion has had no effect on the mountains.

Explanation:

  • The mountain chain, also called the Urals, Uralskie Gory, or Ural, are a geological formation in west-central Russia that produces up a big portion of the normal physiographic border between Europe and Asia.
  • The mountains form up the bulk of the Uralian orogenic belt, which stretches 2,175 miles (3,500 km) from the Aral Sea to the northernmost tip of island and stretches 1,550 miles (2,500 km) from the bend of the Ural River within the south to the low, severely eroded Pay-Khoy Ridge, which forms a 250-mile (400-km) fingerlike extension to the northern tip of the Urals proper.
  • The Mughalzhar Hills, a large, arrowhead-shaped southern extension in northwest Kazakhstan that separates the Caspian and Aral basins, are themselves part of the Uralian orogenic band.
  • The Urals' north-south path cuts across the broad latitudinal landscape sections of the Eurasian landmass, from Arctic waste to semidesert, despite its relatively limited breadth, which ranges from from 20 to 90 miles (32 to 145 km).
  • The Urals also are the house of peoples with ancient roots and are a component of a highly developed industrial complex that's linked to the mineral-rich Siberian region.

Thus, the proper option is erosion has had no effect on the mountains.

#SPJ2

Similar questions