What impression have you formed of swami relation with his father how should children and their parent's behave with each other
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Relation between Swami and his father had no sense. There was no understanding between Swami and his father. His father was an adamant obstinate strict stubble and a challenging man. He always wanted Swami to face trouble to make him strong rather than coward. Swami always got in trouble through his father. His father always showed him attitude and wanted to prove that he is right in all senses of life show that Swaminathan becomes such. His father showed hardness to him but from the inner side of the heart he was caring person for Swaminathan which could be felt from the story and not seen through the story .There should be an understanding relationship between the parents and their children to make the strong bond. They should not lie between each other.
HOPE IT HELPS U
Please mate mark it the brainliest answer
Answer:
The voyage in the company of the Swami was an education for Turiyananda and Nivedita. From beginning to end a vivid flow of thought and stories went on. One never knew what moment would bring the flash of intuition and the ringing utterance of some fresh truth. That encyclopaedic mind touched all subjects: Christ, Buddha, Krishna, Ramakrishna, folklore, the history of India and Europe, the degradation of Hindu society and the assurance of its coming greatness, different philosophical and religious systems, and many themes more. All was later admirably recorded by Sister Nivedita in The Master as I Saw Him, from which the following fragments may be cited.
'Yes,' the Swami said one day, 'the older I grow, the more everything seems to me to lie in manliness. This is my new gospel. Do even evil like a man! Be wicked, if you must, on a grand scale!' Some time before, Nivedita had complimented India on the infrequency of crime; on that occasion the Swami said in sorrowful protest: 'Would to God it were otherwise in my land! For this is verily the virtuousness of death.' Evidently, according to him, the vilest crime was not to act, to do nothing at all.
Regarding conservative and liberal ideas he said: 'The conservative's whole ideal is submission. Your ideal is struggle. Consequently it is we who enjoy life, and never you! You are always striving to change yours to something better, and before a millionth part of the change is carried out, you die. The Western ideal is to be doing; the Eastern, to be suffering. The perfect life would be a wonderful harmony between doing and suffering. But that can never be.'
Explanation: