what is peculiar with zanu pf of Zimbabwe?
Answers
Answered by
36
Zimbabwe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert Mugabe, has been ruling the country since independence. Elections have been held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF. President Mugabe is popular but also uses unfair practices in elections. And these were the practices:-
1) Over the years his government has changed the constitution several times to increase the powers of the president and make him less accountable.
2) Opposition parties were harassed,
3) Their meetings were also disrupted.
4) Public protests and demonstrations against the government are declared illegal.
5) There is a law that limits the right to criticise the president.
6) Television and radio are controlled by the government and give only the ruling party's version.
7) There are independent newspapers but the government harasses those journalists who go against it.
8) The government has ignored some court judgments that went against it and has pressurized judges.
The example of Zimbabwe shows that popular approval of the rulers is necessary for a democracy, but not sufficient.
Popular governments can be undemocratic and autocratic.
A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT SHOULD RULE WITHIN LIMITS SET BY CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND CITIZENS' RIGHTS.
1) Over the years his government has changed the constitution several times to increase the powers of the president and make him less accountable.
2) Opposition parties were harassed,
3) Their meetings were also disrupted.
4) Public protests and demonstrations against the government are declared illegal.
5) There is a law that limits the right to criticise the president.
6) Television and radio are controlled by the government and give only the ruling party's version.
7) There are independent newspapers but the government harasses those journalists who go against it.
8) The government has ignored some court judgments that went against it and has pressurized judges.
The example of Zimbabwe shows that popular approval of the rulers is necessary for a democracy, but not sufficient.
Popular governments can be undemocratic and autocratic.
A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT SHOULD RULE WITHIN LIMITS SET BY CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND CITIZENS' RIGHTS.
Similar questions