What is Textual Grammar ?
Answers
Answered by
2
to serious logical analysis, the more so while at least some of them appear
to be identical with genuine logical principies. A (natural) text logic has as
its main task to formulate these principies of intersentential relations, as well
as the constraints which these put on the logical form of sentences in a text.
It is not strange that we claim that a logic of natural language should be
a text logic, not only for empirical and grammatical reasons, but also for the
simple reason that logical systems themselves are in fact formal text logics.
Derivations (proofs) constructed by the rules and categories of such systems
are also `discourses', consisting of coherent (consistent) sequences of sen-
tences. We will argue below that there are certain non-trivial analogies
between the structures and principies of formal proofs and systems (theories)
on the one hand and the structures and principies of texts in natural language
on the other hand. More in general we assume, then, that the most relevant
application or elaboration of logic for natural language pertains to the ab-
stract constructs we call `texts', such as they must be generated by text
grammars, even when, e.g. speaking of (complex) sentences, we merely refer
implicitly to texts.
Before we begin our preliminary remarks to support these claims and
hypotheses, let us first briefly and informally recall the main characteristics
of the grammar we have in mind.
to be identical with genuine logical principies. A (natural) text logic has as
its main task to formulate these principies of intersentential relations, as well
as the constraints which these put on the logical form of sentences in a text.
It is not strange that we claim that a logic of natural language should be
a text logic, not only for empirical and grammatical reasons, but also for the
simple reason that logical systems themselves are in fact formal text logics.
Derivations (proofs) constructed by the rules and categories of such systems
are also `discourses', consisting of coherent (consistent) sequences of sen-
tences. We will argue below that there are certain non-trivial analogies
between the structures and principies of formal proofs and systems (theories)
on the one hand and the structures and principies of texts in natural language
on the other hand. More in general we assume, then, that the most relevant
application or elaboration of logic for natural language pertains to the ab-
stract constructs we call `texts', such as they must be generated by text
grammars, even when, e.g. speaking of (complex) sentences, we merely refer
implicitly to texts.
Before we begin our preliminary remarks to support these claims and
hypotheses, let us first briefly and informally recall the main characteristics
of the grammar we have in mind.
Answered by
4
☺☺☺HEY MATE YOUR ANSWER IS HERE. ....☺☺☺
A text grammar is the study of texts above the level of the sentence. It shows how texts are put together so as to convey ideas, facts, messages, and fiction. A similar term is discourse analysis. Both are mostly concerned with natural language use; discourse analysis would include spoken language.
☺☺☺PLZZ MARK ME BRAINLIEST. ..☺☺☺
A text grammar is the study of texts above the level of the sentence. It shows how texts are put together so as to convey ideas, facts, messages, and fiction. A similar term is discourse analysis. Both are mostly concerned with natural language use; discourse analysis would include spoken language.
☺☺☺PLZZ MARK ME BRAINLIEST. ..☺☺☺
Similar questions