what is the conclusion of the conflicts took place in contries like sri lanka and Belgium in regards thir ethnic composition which power sharing is better
state
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
The structure of power sharing of Belgium was way more better than that of Sri Lanka's.
Explanation:
- In Belgium the conflict between French and Dutch speakers was settled at the political level.
- In the Central Government the representation of both french and dutch speakers were same.
- In belgium the french accepted equal representation of dutchs as they have too accepted their equal representation in the central government.
- A community Government was setup, which was elected by the one language community- dutch,french and germans. This government has power regarding culutural, educational and religious matters.
IN CASE OF SRI LANKA
- In Sri Lanka the Sinhala community enjoyed unfair advantage of majority.
- The control over the government was too in hands of majority community i.e. Sinhala community.
- The autonomy of Tamils was undermined.
- Tamils were discriminated and the preffrence of sinhala applicants dominated the tamil applicants in terms of job and university admissions.
- Sinhala was made the official language of Sri Lanka this led to the creation of the feeling of alienation.
- The relations between Tamils and Sinhalas strained over time period and a Civil War broke out.
Conclusion: Power sharing streghthens the nation and its integrity and unity. It is the very idea of democracy.
Similar questions