History, asked by linakhule, 1 month ago

what is the conclusion of the conflicts took place in contries like sri lanka and Belgium in regards thir ethnic composition which power sharing is better
state​

Answers

Answered by punti445
0

Answer:

The structure of power sharing of Belgium was way more better than that of Sri Lanka's.

Explanation:

  • In Belgium the conflict between French and Dutch speakers was settled at the political level.
  • In the Central Government the representation of both french and dutch speakers were same.
  • In belgium the french accepted equal representation of dutchs as they have too accepted their equal representation in the central government.
  • A community Government was setup, which was elected by the one language community- dutch,french and germans. This government has power regarding culutural, educational and religious matters.

IN CASE OF SRI LANKA

  • In Sri Lanka the Sinhala community enjoyed unfair advantage of majority.
  • The control over the government was too in hands of majority community i.e. Sinhala community.
  • The autonomy of Tamils was undermined.
  • Tamils were discriminated and the preffrence of sinhala applicants dominated the tamil applicants in terms of job and university admissions.
  • Sinhala was made the official language of Sri Lanka this led to the creation of the feeling of alienation.
  • The relations between Tamils and Sinhalas strained over time period and a Civil War broke out.

Conclusion: Power sharing streghthens the nation and its integrity and unity. It is the very idea of democracy.

Similar questions