What is the difference between an
scm audit and a technical
review ? can their function
be folded into one review ? What are
pos and Cons?
Answers
Answer:
Formal Technical Reviews are used for improving software quality, whereas software configuration management audit is usually used to answer the questions that are indirectly related to software to achieve the desired quality.
Answer:
The formal technical review focuses on the technical correctness of the modified configuration object. A software configuration audit, on the other hand, examines a configuration object for other characteristics. As a result, it verifies that the changes have been properly implemented.
Explanation:
Their function be folded into one review of Formal Technical Reviews are used to improve software quality, whereas software configuration management audits are typically used to answer questions about software configuration management in order to achieve the desired quality.
Scm audit:
Reduction in redundant work. Effective management of concurrent updates. Prevents configuration-related issues. SCM audits to ensure that the software product meets the baseline requirements and that what is built matches what is delivered. SCM audits also ensure that all CIs are traceable and that all work requests are associated with one or more CI modifications. Mismanaged Implementation – Changing a supply chain management system necessitates a financial investment, as well as time and human resources. If not properly implemented, there will be wasted labor, service redundancy, and missed deadlines, all of which will result in significant costs.
Technical review:
To ensure that technical concepts are correctly applied at an early stage. To gain access to the value of technical concepts and product alternatives. Consistency in the application and representation of technical concepts. The first is the length of the process, because some people must spend time reviewing the code while others must fix it. Another disadvantage is that the developers' time must be compensated, which raises the project implementation costs.