Question

What is the difference in who exercises executive power in the above two constitution of nepal keeping this in mind , why do u thin nepal needs a new constituion today

Answer 1

There was a dire need for a new constitutionas the ideals of the people had changed as the country had moved from a monarchy to a democracy. ... The people of Nepal fought for a democratic government for many years. So the old constitution does not reflect the ideals of the people.

Answer 2

Answer:

The difference in who exercises “Executive Power” in the given two Constitutions of Nepal is that in the 1990 Constitution, this power was vested in the King and his Council of Ministers, while in the 2007 Interim Constitution of Nepal, “Executive Power” changed hands to being vested only in the Council of Ministers, thereby making Nepal a democracy from being a monarchy.

Nepal needs a new Constitution today because it is no longer a monarchy. The older Constitution vested power in the King, but when the country is now a democracy, a new Constitution is needed to reflect the “democratic” ideals of Nepal that the peoples’ movement desired and fought for. In order to achieve this, all its constitutive rules must be changed

Explanation:hope it well help you