Question

what is the most accepted hypothesis on the origin of life on earth

Answer 1

The origin of life is incredibly complicated. The most accepted hypothesis keeps changing. In 1953 when Miller and Urey did their experiments with electric ‘lightning’ sparks and simple molecules, it seemed like that was how life started. But life is more than that. Then there was the ‘RNA World’ hypothesis, that RNA did all the things proteins do today, but life is more than that, too. Little proteins are so much simpler to make than little pieces of RNA, so there would have been little proteins around before the origin of life. Where did life start? For a long time a lot of scientists thought hot vents in the deep ocean were the best place for life to start, but the evidence for that hypothesis seems to be getting weaker, not stronger. The cover article in the August 2017 issue of Scientific American says wetting and drying in hot pools on land is the best hypothesis. Indeed, a lot of scientists are finding that wetting and drying cycles can make molecules found in living cells. I think the spaces between the sheets of black mica, biotite, have many advantages for the origin of life, but people need to do experiments to test that hypothesis.
this is the answer

Answer 2

I think its harold urey and stanley millers experimental verification of chemical origin of life