Question

What is the problem with the periodisation of Indian history that James Mill offers?
i want 1 word ans of the question plz​

Answer 1

Answer:

there is no one word answer for this question but the shortest will be..

james mill devided the indian history in 3 parts ....hindu , muslim , and british..but it was very difficult to recognise for hindu and muslims because a variety of faiths existed during that period...

hope it helped

Answer 2

James Mill divided his book into three period, namely: Hindu Muslims and British. According to his prejudiced version of Indian history, the British rule represents all the forces of progress and civilisation, while the period before British rule represents darkness, ignorance, despotism, religious intolerance, caste taboos, superstitious practices, etc.

The view of Mill has several problems which is not acceptable due to reasons:

A variety of faiths existed simultaneously in these periods.

All rulers in ancient India did not share the same faith.So naturally there wouldn't be religious tolerance.This will be a hindrance to the progress, enlightenment and happiness of the nation. 

So we cannot characterise an age only through the religion of the rulers of the time.

Thus the problem with the periodisation of Indian history that James Mill offers is that the subjective account of a historian distorts the facts.