Social Sciences, asked by Talingting09, 9 months ago

what is the similarities of jason hickel's framework and Martin Heidegger The Question Technology?

Answers

Answered by xXDevilxRuelXx
0

....

.. IT was six men of Indostan

To learning much inclined,

Who went to see the Elephant

(Though all of them were blind),

That each by observation

Might satisfy his mind.

II.

The First approached the Elephant,

And happening to fall

Against his broad and sturdy side,

At once began to bawl:

"God bless me!—but the Elephant

Is very like a wall!"

III.

The Second, feeling of the tusk,

Cried: "Ho!—what have we here

So very round and smooth and sharp?

To me 't is mighty clear

This wonder of an Elephant

Is very like a spear!"

IV.

The Third approached the animal,

And happening to take

The squirming trunk within his hands,

Thus boldly up and spake:

"I see," quoth he, "the Elephant

Is very like a snake!"

V.

The Fourth reached out his eager hand,

And felt about the knee.

"What most this wondrous beast is like

Is mighty plain," quoth he;

"'T is clear enough the Elephant

Is very like a tree!"

VI.

The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,

Said: "E'en the blindest man

Can tell what this resembles most;

Deny the fact who can,

This marvel of an Elephant

Is very like a fan!"

VII.

The Sixth no sooner had begun

About the beast to grope,

Than, seizing on the swinging tail

That fell within his scope,

"I see," quoth he, "the Elephant

Is very like a rope!"

VIII.

And so these men of Indostan

Disputed loud and long,

Each in his own opinion

Exceeding stiff and strong,

Though each was partly in the right,

And all were in the wrong!

MORAL.

So, oft in theologic wars

The disputants, I ween,

Rail on in utter ignorance

Of what each other mean,

And prate about an Elephant

Not one of them has seen!

Answered by kirtisingh01
0

  • That is a great deal to dissect however I assume since u pose the inquiry u as of now perceive how theyre associated.

  • I'd state both are humanist and greenie in see, and worried about the dangerous idea of incredible human develops like tech/econ arrangement. In any case, neither considers these to be as intrinsically awful. They r simply large things we made that have turned crazy and should be utilized right.

  • However they pitch at diff levels. Heid is concerned w how in contact we r w ourselves, our being, the world we normally live in. Tech can drive us from that. Hic's interests are more sociopolitical - neediness, maintainability. At the point when settled, heid has tech reflect us like a piercing life exercise, while hick has econ improve human life norms and the regular world.

  • In a Chinese storyline, heid is the easy daoist, hick the progressive confucian researcher.
Similar questions