what measures should the league of nations have taken to avoid the second world war?
Answers
Answered by
36
league of nations must have tried to organise or take military assistance from the member nations to stop the dictatorship of the bigger and aggressive nations and also must have tried to solve the economic crisis of Germany which created a sense of backwardness plz mark my answer the brainliest
Answered by
14
I think main reason of World War II’s beginning was the difficult relationship between Soviet Union and the West
At first we should understand what convinced Hitler in attacking Poland (the event which caused France and Britain enter in war with Germany, thus starting World War II):
the APPEASEMENT: Hitler wasn’t sure Germany could fight a two fronts-war (he strongly believed it was one of the reasons why Germany had been defeated in World War I), so he waited until he was sure Western powers wouldn’t attack him. The Appeasement policy promoted by Eduard Daladier and Neville Chamberlain prompted Hitler’s plans for Germany’s expansion, convincing him that attacking Poland wouldn’t lead to an escalation (before Poland Hitler successfully invaded/annexed Saarland, Rhineland, Austria, Sudetenland, Czechoslovakia and Memel). The Appeasement was motived by England and France’s common hope Hitler would have been a bulwark against communism.
the MOLOTOV-RIBBENTROP PACT: which, in fact, wasn’t completely Stalin’s fault. Despite first Soviet-German talks started in late 1933, Stalin could clearly recognize danger Hitler constituted, he surely knew Nazism main goal was the colonization of Eastern Europe (Soviet Union included) and was aware of Soviet military weakness caused by the infamous Great Purges. But, while trading raw materials with Germany (USSR was also obliged in doing that, being under sanctions by most of the Western countries), Stalin secretly called for a tripartite allegiance (USSR-England-France) against Nazi Germany since the sign of the Franco-Soviet Treaty of Mutual Assistance (1935). But England and France preferred waiting until it was too late to stop Hitler’s war machine and the day after the failed allegiance the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed, giving Stalin enough time to move the military-industrial complex on the Urals thus isolating him more and increasing USSR rupture with the West (which culminated in 1939 with the expulsion of USSR from the League of Nations).
IF the relations between USSR, France and Britain were better and the tripartite allegiance worked, Stalin could have crushed Hitlers in a decade before, preventing not only World War II but Winter War too. Maybe, with a coalition of Western forces Cold War wouldn’t have neither happened and Soviet imperialism never existed.
Otherwise who knows what would have happened instead in Germany? What would have thought the Germans if Hitler’s prediction of a “Zionist-Communist allegiance against the Aryan race” really happened with a Soviet-German War in mid-1930s? Maybe Hitler would have fallen earliest, but Nazism would have survived as Stalin occupied Berlin in a preventive-war.
At first we should understand what convinced Hitler in attacking Poland (the event which caused France and Britain enter in war with Germany, thus starting World War II):
the APPEASEMENT: Hitler wasn’t sure Germany could fight a two fronts-war (he strongly believed it was one of the reasons why Germany had been defeated in World War I), so he waited until he was sure Western powers wouldn’t attack him. The Appeasement policy promoted by Eduard Daladier and Neville Chamberlain prompted Hitler’s plans for Germany’s expansion, convincing him that attacking Poland wouldn’t lead to an escalation (before Poland Hitler successfully invaded/annexed Saarland, Rhineland, Austria, Sudetenland, Czechoslovakia and Memel). The Appeasement was motived by England and France’s common hope Hitler would have been a bulwark against communism.
the MOLOTOV-RIBBENTROP PACT: which, in fact, wasn’t completely Stalin’s fault. Despite first Soviet-German talks started in late 1933, Stalin could clearly recognize danger Hitler constituted, he surely knew Nazism main goal was the colonization of Eastern Europe (Soviet Union included) and was aware of Soviet military weakness caused by the infamous Great Purges. But, while trading raw materials with Germany (USSR was also obliged in doing that, being under sanctions by most of the Western countries), Stalin secretly called for a tripartite allegiance (USSR-England-France) against Nazi Germany since the sign of the Franco-Soviet Treaty of Mutual Assistance (1935). But England and France preferred waiting until it was too late to stop Hitler’s war machine and the day after the failed allegiance the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed, giving Stalin enough time to move the military-industrial complex on the Urals thus isolating him more and increasing USSR rupture with the West (which culminated in 1939 with the expulsion of USSR from the League of Nations).
IF the relations between USSR, France and Britain were better and the tripartite allegiance worked, Stalin could have crushed Hitlers in a decade before, preventing not only World War II but Winter War too. Maybe, with a coalition of Western forces Cold War wouldn’t have neither happened and Soviet imperialism never existed.
Otherwise who knows what would have happened instead in Germany? What would have thought the Germans if Hitler’s prediction of a “Zionist-Communist allegiance against the Aryan race” really happened with a Soviet-German War in mid-1930s? Maybe Hitler would have fallen earliest, but Nazism would have survived as Stalin occupied Berlin in a preventive-war.
Similar questions