What rights and privileges did Christians have that Jews did not? in shakespeare era
Answers
Answer:
Had Shakespeare wished to speak with someone raised in the Jewish faith he could have done so easily enough. There was a converts’ house in London, the Domus Conversorum, which was in existence on Chancery Lane from 1232, when it was founded by King Henry III as a home for poor Jewish converts to Christianity. Throughout the 16th century (with the exception of the years 1551–78), a handful of poor Jewish converts resided there. One of them, Yehuda Menda, had been publicly converted at All Hallows Church in London in 1577 by John Foxe, more famous for his Book of Martyrs. Foxe tells us in his Sermon Preached at the Christening of a Certain Jew that Menda had lived in London as a Jew before his conversion, having been ‘transported from out the uttermost parts of Barbary into England, and conversant amongst us, by the space of five whole years’ before his baptism. Foxe’s sermon gives a vivid sense of some of the disturbing beliefs Elizabethans held about Jews: he speaks of their ‘heinous abominations, insatiable butcheries, treasons, frenzies, and madness’.
Foxe also charges them with ritual murder, condemning their ‘intolerable scorpion-like savageness, so furiously boiling against the innocent infants of Christian Gentiles’. Samuel Purchas elaborates upon this accusation in his Purchas his Pilgrimage. ‘One cruel and (to speak the properest phrase) Jewish crime was usual amongst them every year towards Easter ... to steal a young boy, circumcise him, and after a solemn judgement, making one of their own nation a Pilate, to crucify him out of their devilish malice to Christ and Christians.’ Even John Donne offers a variant of this libel in one of his sermons where he describes the ‘barbarous and inhumane custom of the Jews,’ who ‘always keep in readiness the blood of some Christian, with which they anoint the body of any that dies amongst them, with these words, “If Jesus Christ were the Messiah, then may the blood of this Christian avail thee to salvation.”’
Many of the chronicles and histories published at the time were full of stories of Jewish criminality. Jews were described not only as circumcisers and emasculators of Christian men (and as seducers of Christian women) but as poisoners, usurers, and host desecrators. Sir John Mandeville’s popular Travels, reprinted well into the 17th century, even warns of a Jewish military threat: at the time of Antichrist the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel, now penned in beyond the hills of Cathay, ‘shall come out, and Christian men shall be in their subjection, as they be under Christian men now.’ A number of writers proposed that after their expulsion from England in 1290 the Jews had migrated to Scotland, which explained why Scots were so close-fisted and hated pork. There was even a scheme to resettle foreign Jews in Ireland: in 1607, Sir Thomas Shirley urged King James to resolve in one stroke both the Irish and the Jewish problem, while reaping the benefit of heavy taxation. His suggestion was not acted on (though it was still taken seriously enough a half-century later in James Harington’s political treatise, Oceana).
The Jew’s body was a site of particular anxiety. English writers, including both Christopher Marlowe and Thomas Dekker, make much of the foeter judaicus, the so-called Jewish stench. James Howell’s view is representative: ‘it seems there is a kind of curse also fallen upon their bodies; witness the uncouth looks and odd cast of eye,’ as well as ‘that rankish kind of scent no better indeed than a stink.’ The blackness of the Jews also caught the attention of a number of writers; when William Brereton jotted down his impressions of the Jews in the synagogue in Amsterdam in 1635 he noted that the Jewish ‘men are black ... and insatiably given unto women.’ Perhaps the most bizarre of the claims made about the Jews was one tentatively advanced by Thomas Calvert, who argued that Jewish men menstruated: ‘Jews, men as well as females, are punished curso menstruo sanguinis, with a very frequent blood flux.’