History, asked by brisan248, 10 months ago

What was the most significant result of President Johnson’s impeachment?
A.Reconstruction was able to move forward without his interference.
B.Andrew Johnson had to resign as president and leave office.
C.Johnson was convicted and a new president was elected.
D.Presidents were no longer allowed to fire government officials.

Answers

Answered by hotelcalifornia
0

D. Presidents were no longer allowed to fire government officials.

How is it so?

  • The centre of the preliminary was about the Tenure of Office Act, however, the issues were a lot more extensive than that.
  • Johnson's informers contended that not just had he disregarded the Tenure of Office Act, yet additionally that he addressed the arrival of "Slave Power" to the United States.
  • Johnson's protectors blamed Republicans for involving prosecution as a political device.
  • 35 Senators cast a ballot to convict Johnson, and nineteen cast a ballot to vindicate.
  • This was one vote shy of the 66% larger part that the Constitution expects to eliminate a President from office.
  • President Johnson served the excess ten months of his term as President.
  • He kept on rejecting charges that he considered unlawful, however, he authorized the regulations when passed.

#SPJ3

Answered by krithikasmart11
0

Answer:

D. Presidents were no longer allowed to fire government officials

Explanation:

The Tenure of Office Act was at the heart of the inquiry, but the concerns were far broader than that. Johnson's informants said that he not only ignored the Tenure of Office Act, but also addressed the rise of "Slave Power" in the United States. Republicans, according to Johnson's supporters, used the prosecution as a political tool. Thirty-five Senators voted to condemn Johnson, while nineteen voted to vindicate him. This was one vote short of the 66% majority required by the Constitution to remove a President from office. President Johnson served the remaining 10 months of his presidency. He continued to reject charges that he thought illegal, but he authorised the restrictions when they were passed.

#SPJ3

Similar questions