History, asked by dhanrajmohal02, 8 months ago

what were the thinking of radicals​

Answers

Answered by Lovlover2111
2

What is radical thinking

To deal with ideas problems and solutions we need to think radically. We need to understand how things are connected. How one thing affects another, how language is used. How we analyze what is being said, offered and executed on behalf of ourselves.

One of the first things you learn in dealing in radical ideas is people are very wary of the title radical. The title conjures up for some the pejorative “trouble making disgruntled lefties”, a form of vilification used in right wing quarters for anyone who speaks against their policies or ideology. So really we are just meaning thinking using the facts available to us rather than what others would like us to think.

The root

Of course if you do a “Radical Thinking” search on the internet, far from the views of disgruntled lefties, you are more likely to come up with titles such as “Annual plan for business requires radical planning,” or “Knowledge revolution demands radical thinking,” or “Modern materials handling requires radical thinking” and “Institute of Radical Thinking”.

Business uses radical thinking, radical planning, radical changes constantly, mostly in order to cut costs, staff and increase profits. Only when “radical thinking” is applied by the person in the street does the term become pejorative, trouble making and dangerous.

My idea of radical thinking is the same as the businessman’s. That is getting down to the root of the situation or problem. It is not useful to concentrate on the beauty of the blooming flower if its roots are infected by disease. You might appreciate the flowers beauty in the short term. But if you wish to enjoy the flower next year, radical action needs to be taken to save the roots. The question to ask is how much do you see happening around you in society that relies on surface gloss but has no basis for sustainability?

The plant and root analogy can be applied to a great many things in our personal and community life. If industry feels the need for radical inspiration in order to exploit the goods and jobs market it would stand to reason that radical thinking would be needed to protect the individual from the same type of forces.

So you can find terms such as “radical” when applied to business are seen as progressive, but the same term used in social inclusion, poverty, unions, or workers rights the word becomes derogatory.

So. What are the benefits of radical thinking and why should we use it when trying to affect change or improve our situation? We need to think radically because we want a lasting effect. We need good foundations to build upon. We need to be sure of the premise (reason) for the arguments put forward as progressive change. Discussing the ideas, how they came about, who will benefit by them and if they are of any real use to ordinary people.

Think of words by what they mean not by what they are used to represent. The term radical from the Latin “radicalis” means “root”… It means getting to the root of the issue or problem. So if we want to understand more about what is going on around us sometimes we need to apply some radical thinking. If you want think of it as common sense.

hope you like the answer

Answered by dadishanti
0

Answer:

here is a common misconception about the term “radical”. People think it is the same as “extreme”, but actually “radical” comes from the latin word “radix”, meaning root. Radical thinking is a kind of philosophical thought that tries to understand the world based on its roots, so they look to problems searching for their most basic principles and foundations.

Although this perspective is used in several ways, normally in human sciences it permits to make large and profound criticism on almost any area, questioning the validity of any previous assumption.

It’s common to radical thinkers to look for the historical origins of concepts that organize society, politics or economy and deconstruct them. Ideas, practices and habits that most of the time as seen as “natural” or “logic” are shown to be quite arbitrary. What was seen as “common sense” is subverted, identified as a consequence of historical power struggles, traditions of the local culture or even simply a fruit of chance.

By looking deep into things, they can abandon common truisms and take an out of the box approach, allowing theoreticians and scholars to make very brave, revolutionary and innovative claims. As most of the people doesn’t know the full reasoning behind their propositions, their ideas are taken as unusual and, sometimes, as pretty odd or even bizarre. They are often characterized by being avant-garde and opposed by the more conservative for its irreverence and unorthodoxy.

Explanation:

pls mark brainliest

Similar questions