whats is the difference between traditional and non traditional security?
Answers
Answered by
8
Answer:
In the traditional security, the greatest danger to a country is from military threats. On the other hand the non-traditional security consists of dangers such as terrorism, human rights, global poverty and health epidemics. The creation and sustenance of alliances belong to the category of traditional security.
Answered by
5
- Traditional security is the ability of a state to protect itself from external threats.
- Traditional security (sometimes called national security or national security) describes the prevailing philosophy of international security after the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia and the rise of the nation-state.
- Non-traditional security (NTS) deals with a wide range of human security issues such as climate change, food and resource shortages such as energy, epidemics, natural disasters, transnational crime, human and drug trafficking, and mass migration.
- Traditional security threats are those cited by the military. Meanwhile, non-traditional security threats affect other areas of security, such as the economy, politics, human rights and trade.
- The difference between traditional security and non-traditional security is as follows Traditional security Non-traditional security.
- Traditional concepts of security concern the use or threat of use of military force and military action.
- Non-traditional security goes beyond military action and focuses on other types of threats that affect human existence.
- This concept of security fundamentally threatens the basic values of the state, such as sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity.
- The use of military action also endangers the lives of the inhabitants of the territory. Extending the concept of security through speech.
#SPJ2
Similar questions