When do people become a burden to the society in economics
Answers
Answer:
People born into various societies are indoctrinated into belief and value systems that describe their unique conditions of “burden”. In cooperative societies, people are provided the means to meet their basic needs for survival in order to learn, grow and become actualized members whose contributions add value in the most meaningful and fulfilling ways. In competitive societies, people are made to compete at high levels throughout their lives in order to satisfy their most basic needs. People in competitive societies can spend their entire lifetimes struggling to meet their daily needs while given far fewer opportunities and freedoms (of time, from stress) that are necessary to fully realize the best versions of themselves. In the cooperative society, such things as quality education, healthcare and entry-level housing are human rights, whereas all these things must be earned in the competitive society.
So, to answer the original question, people become a burden to society when the conventional wisdom of that society says they’ve become a burden. And we find that people in competitive societies are far more likely to be considered “burdens” than persons in cooperative societies.
I believe a better question is "Who are the true burdens on society? And the answer to this question shouldn't surprise you.
Those who are said to be burdensome in competitive societies often have pure intentions. Most are driven by the need to prove their social worth but are not given the resources to find meaning and purpose in their lives. For example, people struggling to pay rent and medical bills don't have the means and freedoms to engage in activities that lead to personal growth. There is, however, another segment of society whose intentions are not so pure. These are the persons who harm humanity and planet in tangible ways for their own personal gain. They are the true burdens on society.
In competitive societies, it is people with money and power who ultimately define its social values. And it is for this reason that in such societies, it is the people with pure intentions who are believed to exploit the system and not the actual agents of exploitation.
Of course, any unnecessary harm and suffering should be considered a burden, and it is the role of government, both legislation and legal system, to discover, implement and enforce solutions that remove the conditions that cause the true burdens on society. Such measures would seek to eliminate the behaviors and change the outcomes of those with impure intentions who exploit people and planet for their own personal gain. If this were to occur in the United States, let's say, we would experience a fundamental shift from our predominantly competitive society to a far more cooperative one.
Explanation:
Please thanks me and mark me as brainlist