History, asked by alicuhh2002, 1 year ago

Which accurately describes a letter written during the time a historical event occurred?
A. effective secondary source documentB. too biased for historical evidenceC. too focused for historical evidenceD. unreliable narrative sourceE. useful primary source document

Answers

Answered by Answers4u
4

The correct answer is option E.

A letter written during the time a historical event occurred is a useful primary source document.

Primary source documents are the most original way to understand Historical events.

If it was the letter written for discussing analysing the same historical event after the occurrence of the event, it would have been considered as a secondary source.

Answered by topanswers
0

The correct answer for your question is option (E)-Useful Primary Source Documents.

Primary source Documents involves Diaries, Journals, Letters, memos, Photos, Videos, Opinion Polls, Speeches and none the less governmental records.

If a writer is about to describe a letter written during the time of a historical event that occurred once, the writer must have to site a source of the letter. Either the source may be the letter itself or the some other sources.

Similar questions