Which best states how responses to the Scott v. Sandford decision differed in the North and South?
answer choices
People in the North agreed with part of the decision, while people in the South agreed with all of it.
People in the North disagreed with the whole decision, while people in the South only agreed with part of it.
People in both the North and South disagreed with the whole decision.
People in the South welcomed the decision, while people in the North feared it.
Answers
Answered by
9
Answer:
People in the North agreed with part of the decision, while people in the South agreed with all of it. ... People in both the North and South disagreed with the whole decision. People in the South welcomed the decision, while people in the North feared it.
Answered by
10
People in the North agreed with part of the decision, while people in the South agreed with all of it.
Option : (a)
Explanation:
- According to the response received by the Scott vs Sandford, the South agreed to most of it while the North only agreed to parts of it.
- The Scott vs Sandford ruling was supported by Southerners who felt Congress had the authority to ban slavery in the territory.
- Broadly speaking, the Dred Scott judgment had the effect of widening the North-South political and social divide and taking the country back to the verge of Civil War.
- On the other hand, the Northerners became aggravated as the case brought the control to the Southern Slaveholders.
- Lots of Northerners switched to the Republican party to block their influence.
To Know More
In the Scott v Sanford case why was the argument of sanfords widow based on the fifth amendment
https://brainly.in/question/16348382
In the Scott v Sanford case why was the argument of sanfords widow based on the fifth amendment
https://brainly.in/question/16348382
Similar questions