Chemistry, asked by omipatel, 1 year ago

which compound is named 666 ? why ?

Answers

Answered by kamilanava06
1

Element 666 to be Named

Chemistry is in the news this week with the confirmation by a research group in Sweden of the super heavy element number 115, previously reported by Russian researchers.


Element 115 currently has a temporary name, ununpentium.


In anticipation of the future discovery of the ultra-super-duper heavy element number 666, I’d like to propose the name unrepentium.


The_number_of_the_beast_is_666


[Image: William Blake’s painting, The number of the beast is 666.]


ADVERTISEMENT


Advertisements


Report this ad


Report this ad

Share this:

Related

Erdös with a non-kosher side of Bacon

In "Humor"

Thirty years is enough

In "Humor"

What Was I Thinking?

In "Humor"

1 Comment

Filed under Humor

Tagged as chemistry, humor

One response to “Element 666 to be Named”

Mark O. Martin

August 28, 2013 at 2:52 pm

I am so glad you like William Blake’s artwork—I sure do! And long before it was worked into “Red Dragon.”


Follow This Blog

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

Ralph Evans

Thirty years is NOT enough

Thirty years is enough

Ex Laboratorium

Time fleas, with apologies to Jonathan Swift

The Philosophers’ Way

You got

Ralph Evans

Thirty years is NOT enough

Thirty years is enough

Ex Laboratorium

Time fleas, with apologies to Jonathan Swift

The Philosophers’ Way

You gotta know when to hold ‘em

LTEE Birthday

Counting down to 30 years!

February 24th, 2018

The LTEE turns 30 years old!

Tags

academic life Albert Bennett BEACON behavior Bill Nye blogging Bruce Levin Caroline Turner chance and necessity Charles Darwin Charles Ofria citrate clonal interference competition Darwinian medicine disease diversity Dom Schneider ecology education endowments evolution experimental evolution experimental methods family fitness frequency-dependent selection generations genetics genomics Gerhard Lenski giving talks history of science humor Jeff Barrick Jim Smith job market Ken Ham liberty life LTEE luck mentoring microbiology Mike Travisano Mike Wiser misrepresentation Morgan Freeman musings on science must-read papers mutation Neerja Hajela Neil Shubin Nelson Hairston NSF old books peer review Philip Hefner philosophy of science publication Richard Dawkins Rob Pennock science science and religion science communication social media Tami Lieberman teaching theory and experiments Through the Wormhole time time travel twitter work-life balance Zachary Blount

Recent Comments

Judith Mongold-Diers on Ralph Evans

Nkrumah Grant on Ralph Evans

Mark Martin on Ralph Evans

Don S on Thirty years is enough

Links 4/3/18 | Mike the Mad Biologist on Thirty years is enough

Guy Plunkett III on Thirty years is enough

The Best April Fool’s Joke « Nothing in Biology Makes Sense! on Thirty years is NOT enough

Top Posts

Thirty years is NOT enough

Teaching Competition and Predation from a Microbiological Perspective

Science and Religion: Vive la Différence

A Blast from the Past

Thirty years is enough




omipatel: plz give simple ans
Similar questions