Social Sciences, asked by adityasharmajan428, 11 months ago

Which media is less effective in cultivating public opinion

Answers

Answered by sharonhaq414
3

Explanation:

Public Opinion - The role of Media

Introduction.

There is a growing fear of the stranger, broad generalizations, and negative associations,

humiliating and dehumanizing labels attached to refugees, asylum seekers, migrants and

immigrants, more and more intolerance, xenophobia and racism are being fostered in host

countries towards these groups.

To make sure that extremism, discrimination and racism do not gain upper hand of the majority of

the populations, a culture of tolerance and peaceful living conditions a massive public education

program should be developed and incorporated in our schools, organizations and systems to

cultivate acceptance and better understanding of the reasons for the presence of refugees, asylum

seekers and migrants and creatively use their skills which they bring together to the host countries.

In this perspective formal and informal education on the rights and plights of the refugees and

asylum seekers and migrants should be integrated. Educational institutions, schools and

universities through their curricula, should integrate programs of refugee and migrant laborers’

rights and fight back racism and xenophobia. Through informal education, the mass media, the

newspapers and the electronic communication systems masses & communities should be

communicated a culture of tolerance and peaceful living with the stranger.

The Role of The Media

Media is the most powerful tool for the formation of Public opinion in contemporary times. It is the

Television, the press, the radio and the Internet. (Films, magazines, posters, studies, reports,

theater, art, dance, public speeches, hearings)

Talking about the media is like talking about a mission. A source of information and education that

will shape the daily choices in people’s life. That will shape the thinking, and the perception of

things. But Media is a political power and tool, occupied in a way by the big powers, international

corporations, big agencies using for their political and economic objectives that control and can

pay. Among the most powerful news agencies in the West are the BBC, CNN, Euro-news, Monte

Carlo, while, Al Jazira, Al Aarabia, LBC, Al Shark El Awsat are the news agencies in the Middle

East. The religious and political leaders of these media agencies are always around to talk, freely

and passing news, stands, and positions to their communities, to the public using them to serve

their political and economic ends.

By the development, advance and spread of technology the world has shrunk into a global village

whereby the remote villages of China, the Pacific island of Hawaii and the deserts of Arabia are on

our everyday screens at home at our dinner tables, telling their stories and worries. Unfortunately,

family, church and community issues at national or international levels are no more concerns for

the educational or moral shaping of the generations to come, it is the war in Iraq, the killings in

Sudan, the terrorist attacks in Israel and Palestine, the Talibans in Afghanistan, the Nuclear

weapons in Iran, the HIV- Aids and poverty in Africa, the boat refugees at the borders of Europe,

Australia or USA. The bloodier, the more violent and scandalous, the more apocalyptic, the more

captive and more popular the station is. The beautiful cultural, historical and musical programs are

no more interesting, who watches them anyhow? Why aren’t they popular, it is either war or sex on

the screens and in the papers, both have economic end purposes: to sell weapons to warring

countries or to sell human beings in the sex industry, the most rentable of all the businesses.

3

It is important that the media redefines its goals and mission, for the rule of the jungle, “la raison du

plus fort” is the world order today. The role and the mission of the media is to commit itself to

values that are imperative for today, and it is possible to achieve this goal only if civil societies

commit themselves into risks and understand the need for it and encourage agencies that can play

this role.

Both poles of the world have misleading information and negative perceptions and misconceptions

of each other. The North does not know enough the South and vice versa, the South has negative

perception of the North and rejects every ideology that comes from it. Both need to understand

clearly that there are ways to understand & interpret Islam or Democracy, different spirit of

understanding religion, a spirit of peace and mercy, and Democracy, a spirit of human rights, and

respect for human beings. The South instigated with fundamentalism is burning in war, while, the

North generalizing all middle Easterners as terrorists and Africans as unskilled and poor people is

closing its doors in fear of an influx of refugees and terrorist attacks.

Similar questions