Which of these is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser
possibility of famine in a democratic country?
a Opposition parties can draw attention to hunger and starvation.
b Free press can report suffering from famine in different parts of
the country.
c Government fears its defeat in the next elections.
d People are free to believe in and practise any religion.
Answers
Answered by
14
Option d is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser possibility of famine in a democratic country. This is because practising a religion has nothing to do with preventing famine.
Answered by
7
Answer:
d.
People are free to believe in and practise any religion.
Explanation:
guys plz Follow . me.
l hope it is helpful for you...
Similar questions