Which of these major arguments did the Anti-Federalists offer in opposition to ratification of the Constitution?
Answers
Anti-Federalists. The anti-Federalists and their opposition to ratifying the Constitution were a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights to protect Amercians' civil liberties. The anti-Federalists were chiefly concerned with too much power invested in the national government at the expense of states.
The Anti-Federalist's offer in opposition to ‘ratification of the Constitution’ was set on their belief that the constitution needed a bill of rights. Their argument was that the constitution was not powerful with the laws and judiciary and would result in a situation where the judiciary would become out of control.
Explanation:
- ‘Anti-Federalism’ was a movement that took place in the 18th century which was against the creation of a strong U.S. federal government and it later opposed the ‘ratification of the constitution’.
- Their argument was that the constitution would create a powerful presidency that would result in a monarchy system.
Learn more about Anti-Federalist's
One fundamental way in which the Anti-Federalists and Federalists were similar is that they __________. A. both spoke out for state sovereignty B. both supported a republican form of government C. both maintained that a republic could succeed in a large country D. both found support among both city dwellers and small farmers
https://brainly.in/question/7230012
Which argument would an Anti-Federalist most likely have made at the Constitutional Convention?
https://brainly.in/question/11946616