which party system is better?
Answers
Answer:
Sometimes two-party systems have been seen as preferable to multi-party systems because they are simpler to govern, with less fractiousness and greater harmony, since it discourages radical minor parties, while multi-party systems can sometimes lead to hung parliaments.
Explanation:
pls follow me and I will follow u back and pls make me brainliest
❥There are always some things better in any system rather than absolutely good and bad.
❥One party system is a dictator ship rulling as you can find out in China and North Korea. Now it is fully depend 1on the individual who is a Boss. The great example today you can find out in North Korea and China.
❥Two party system is a better choice as it is been followed by USA. Always they get their better party in power voted by the public. Government continue to function for full terms. They always try to work for the national interest and the welfare of their country men. If they are not to the expectation demanded and desired by the majority of country men they are voted out in next term. As it happenedin the last election in USA, despite the fact that the Obama government was functioning better still was voted out as the country men wanted more and more for them rather than the country itself.
❥Multiple party system is not the better option at present scenario seeing the Indian government functioning. It is very difficult to keep all the alliance partners happy all the time. They are hungry for power, they don't allow the leader of the majority party to become more popular by working for public interest. So they always keep their party interest above the country and the people. Horse trading of members are very very immoral but they are doing it lawfully. This is against their moral but to remain in power and continuing to rule they do it.
❥My own suggestion is that they must change the electroral system to have a better and permanent government for full terms