Question

Which reason would most effectively refute the counterclaim? Counterclaim: In addition to writing acclaimed lyrics, Bob Dylan has written both prose and poetry. I have read Dylan’s book of poetry, Tarantula, and his memoir, Chronicles: Volume One, and think that both books are worthy of the Nobel Prize in Literature. I just don’t think that Dylan’s song lyrics should be awarded in the same category as his books. It is true that Bob Dylan has published traditional poetry and prose. However, neither of the books was very good, and neither won prestigious awards. If the Nobel Prize in Literature considered all writers of at least two mediocre books, the award would mean nothing. It is true that Bob Dylan has published traditional poetry and prose. However, one book of poetry and one memoir would not qualify him for the prize. The prize was awarded based on his songwriting, which does not qualify as literature.

Answer 1

Answer:

I hope you like this answer

please make me brainlist

Answer 2

Answer:

The reason that best refutes the counterclaim is that Bob Dylan was awarded the prize not for his poetry or memoir but for his songwriting.

Explanation:

• A statement that presents an argument in opposition to the claim is known as a counterclaim. In most cases, it is a contrary point of view.
• The counterargument in this instance is that Dylan's writing ought to be awarded the Nobel Prize on the basis of the speaker's reading of the aforementioned works.
• A claim or a counterclaim can be analyzed logically with the help of a statement known as a reason.
• The fact that Dylan was awarded the Nobel Prize for songwriting rather than literature in this instance is evidence that his literary output was not as impressive as the counterclaim asserts it to have been.
• In light of this, the counterclaim that Bob Dylan's writing is exceptional is debunked by this evidence.

#SPJ2