While reading two articles on the CIA’s functions, you discover that both articles have similar opinions and facts, but the first article’s author is a reporter and the second article’s author is a former CIA employee. Which article would be more relevant to your research
Answers
The first article would be more relevant to my research because it may contain less bias and would be more objective. The Reporter is more objective than former CIA employ.
As both articles have similar opinions and facts, the reporter's article would be more relevant. The former CIA employ may be subjective and biased as he was working with the same organisation but the reporter is independent and thus more likely to be objective.
In my opinion if two of the article had the same facts and opinion and both of them were written by a former employee of the CIA along with a reporter then my research would include the article written by the former empoyee of the CIA.
No matter how much the reporter goes hrough in order to uncover the facts and truths, a CIA agent will always give you the truth since he has been in the business before.