Question

Why are primary sources important when studying historical events? A. because they are a direct link to the events in history B. because we would know very little about major historical events without these sources C. because primary sources are the only way we can learn about the culture of a civilization D. because secondary sources are not reliable enough and can’t be trusted

Answer 1

Answer:

the primary introvert

Explanation:

please Mark as brainliest and follow me

Answer 2

Answer: (A) & (D)

• In academic research, primary sources are documents, first-hand accounts or any object that serves as direct evidence of the subject under research/study.
• Primary sources include a diary, artefact, document, recording, manuscript, autobiography, government report or any other source of information that provides direct insights into the subject.
• In the historical study, primary sources are important because they are a direct link to events in history since they're either present there or related to them and secondary sources are accounts of events produced by people not direct witnesses of those events.
• Secondary source does not serve as a first-hand source.
• Therefore, the correct answer is (A) & (D)

#SPJ2