Question

why are written constitutions rigid?​

Answer 1

Answer:

Because to development of country

Answer 2

Explanation:

Rigid Constitution is a constitution which stands above the other laws of the country, while flexible constitutions do not.[1]

A. V. Dicey defines a rigid constitution as one under which certain laws, called constitutional laws or fundamental laws "cannot be changed in the same manner as ordinary laws."[2] A rigid constitution set forth "specific legal/constitutional obstacles to be overcome" before it may be amended, such as special approval of the people by referendum, a supermajority or special majority in the legislature, or both.[3] In contrast, a flexible constitution is one in which the legislature may amended the constitution's content and principles through use of the ordinary legislative process.[3] For example, the Constitution of Australia is rigid, while the British Constitution and the Israeli Constitution are flexible.[3]