why did the child say no to all to the things he was earlier crying. 1 because begin with parents was more important 2 lost interest
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
The child said no to all of the things he was earlier crying
1. because being with parents was more important.
Explanation:
The question has been extracted from the beautiful story "The Lost Child" by an eminent author Mulk Raj Anand.
- The story beautifully revolves around the reactions of the child to the world around him before and after he is lost in the spring fest he went with his parents.
- The story discusses an event in the life of a child who gets lost at a fair. It expresses his fears, anxieties and worries after getting separated from his parents due to his fascination with the world around him.
- When he gets lost and separated from his parents, however, his fascination with the world around him is also lost.
- Initially, the child was very happy while visiting the nearby spring fair with his parents. He was very much impressed by the materialistic things in the fair and demanded some sweets, garlands, toys and balloons, which his parents denied.
- After some time, he got lost in the crowd and separated from his parents.
- The kind gentleman was trying to console him with all things he had earlier asked for. But the kid continuously refused to take anything.
- Within minutes his life changes and offers him an entirely new perspective of looking at life and understanding what is truly important.
- He could realise then that what he wanted the most was his parents and nothing else.
Therefore, option 1. is the correct and most suitable answer.
#SPJ2
Similar questions