Why did the new kings appoint people from their own family or other powerful families to collect revenue and serve in their army ?
Answers
Answer:
The new kings often appointed people from their own family or other powerful families to collect revenue and serve in their army for several reasons:
1.Loyalty and Trust: The new kings could guarantee a higher level of loyalty and trustworthiness by choosing members of their own family or trusted powerful families. They reasoned that individuals who were related to them or who were in close contact with them would be more devoted to and loyal to the throne, lowering the possibility of betrayal or rebellion.
2. Consolidation of Power: The new kings were able to solidify their power and extend their rule by choosing members of their families or people from prominent families. As the king's authority directly affected their own status and privileges, these trusted individuals would have a stake in keeping it.
3. Control and Influence: The kings could have more control and influence over civil and military affairs by appointing relatives or important people to positions of authority. This made it possible for them to keep a firm hold on governance and guarantee that their policies and choices were carried out successfully.
4. Inherited Expertise: With regard to governance, administration, and military affairs, family members or people from wealthy families frequently possessed inherited expertise and knowledge. In the early years of their reigns, when stability and efficient governance were crucial, the new kings may find their experience and comprehension of the complexities of rule to be of great value.
5. Patronage and Alliances: The new kings were also able to form alliances with significant social factions by choosing appointees from wealthy families. The kings were able to establish networks of patronage by giving these families positions of authority, which helped to win the loyalty and support of those who had significant political sway over the populace.
Family members and people from wealthy families could be appointed, but there were risks involved as well. Favoritism and nepotism might result in corruption, ineffectiveness, or the alienation of other societal groups. The advantages of loyalty, control, expertise, and alliances, however, frequently outweighed the potential drawbacks for the new kings, making such appointments a common practice in the quest to consolidate and maintain their power.
Similar Questions:
https://brainly.in/question/1356840
https://brainly.in/question/12923052
#SPJ1