why do we accept constitution which was made 50 years ago
Answers
Answered by
2
The constitution does not reflect the views of its members alone .It expresses a broad consensus of its time.
The second reason for accepting the constitution is that the constituent assembly represented the people of india.
The assembly was dominated by the indian national congress, the party that led indias freedom struggle.
The assembly represented the members from different language, castes, religions, classes and occupations.
The constituent assembly worked in a systematic, open and consensual manner which gives the sancity to the constitution
The second reason for accepting the constitution is that the constituent assembly represented the people of india.
The assembly was dominated by the indian national congress, the party that led indias freedom struggle.
The assembly represented the members from different language, castes, religions, classes and occupations.
The constituent assembly worked in a systematic, open and consensual manner which gives the sancity to the constitution
Answered by
1
HEY MATE THE REQUIRED CRITERIA FOR YOUR ANSWER IS BELOW
I) The Constitution does not reflect the views of its members alone. It expresses a broad consensus of its time.
ii) Over the last half a century, several groups have questioned some provisions of the Constitution. But no large social group or political party has ever questioned the legitimacy of the Constitution itself.
iii) The second reason for accepting the Constitution is that the Constituent Assembly represented the people of India. There was no universal adult franchise at that time. So the Constituent Assembly could not have been chosen directly by all the people of India. It was elected mainly by the members of the existing Provincial Legislatures. This ensured fair geographical share of members from all the regions of the country
iv) The Assembly represented members from different language groups, castes, classes, religions and occupations. Even if the Constituent Assembly was elected by universal adult franchise, its composition would not have been very different.
HOPE IT HELPS U
#THANKS#
I) The Constitution does not reflect the views of its members alone. It expresses a broad consensus of its time.
ii) Over the last half a century, several groups have questioned some provisions of the Constitution. But no large social group or political party has ever questioned the legitimacy of the Constitution itself.
iii) The second reason for accepting the Constitution is that the Constituent Assembly represented the people of India. There was no universal adult franchise at that time. So the Constituent Assembly could not have been chosen directly by all the people of India. It was elected mainly by the members of the existing Provincial Legislatures. This ensured fair geographical share of members from all the regions of the country
iv) The Assembly represented members from different language groups, castes, classes, religions and occupations. Even if the Constituent Assembly was elected by universal adult franchise, its composition would not have been very different.
HOPE IT HELPS U
#THANKS#
Similar questions