History, asked by harshkapoor86, 19 days ago

Why do you think Ziyauddin Barani, a mid fourteenth-century-chronicler, criticised the Sultan?​

Answers

Answered by cutebrainlystar
0

\huge \boxed {\pink{\bold{Answer}}}

Ziauddin Barani is considered to be a very unfair and unreliable source in history. He did not consult his contemporaries. He also criticised Muhammad Tughlaq because he felt that the Sultan had lost his ability of his Ziauddin Barani is considered to be a very unfair and unreliable source in history. He did not consult his contemporaries.

please mark as brainyest answer and thank my answer please ♥️❣️✌️

Answered by nihasrajgone2005
2

Answer:

Ziauddin Barani is considered to be a very unfair and unreliable source in history. He did not consult his contemporaries. He also criticised Muhammad Tughlaq because he felt that the Sultan had lost his ability of his Ziauddin Barani is considered to be a very unfair and unreliable source in history. He did not consult his contemporaries.

please drop some ❤️❤️

Similar questions