Question

Why does a John say that changed paper should not be published?​

Answer 1

Explanation:

Review should be thorough with reviewer comments listed on the review format Provided to the reviewer by the journal editor. Reviewer recommendation to revise and resubmit after addressing all reviewer comments or reject should be clearly noted. The final decision is taken by the editor. Recommendation for rejection should be made based on technical content, originality, contribution to the state of the art knowledge on the subject matter and such. For example, a paper repeating work of others without adding any new knowledge should be recommended for rejection, poorly written paper not complying with the journal format should also be rejected, a paper with technical Mistakes should be rejected, and so on.

Answer 2

: Required Answer

$\longrightarrow$ Sir John told that James’ paper should not be published because he was fearful that the dreadful news of the inevitable collision of the comet with Earth might cause a lot of panic around the world.