Question

Why has the Indian federation been described as a quasi -federation? Give four reasons

Answer 1

the Constitution of India has not described India as a federation. On the other hand, Article 1 of the Constitution describes her as a “Union of States.” This means, India is a union comprising of various States which are integral parts of it. The Indian Union is not destructible. Here, the States can not break away from the union. They do not have the right to secede from the union. In a true federation, the constituting units or the States have the freedom to come out of the union.

India is not a true federation. It combines the features of a federal government and the features of a unitary government which can also be called the non-federal features. Because of this, India is regarded as a semi-federal state. Whereas it describes it as “a quasi-federal state”. The Supreme Court of India also describes it as “a federal structure with a strong bias towards the Centre”.

hope it helped u
plzz mark me as brainliest
plzz

Answer 2

The indian union  is not fully explorable. The States can not split free from the union here. We aren't permitted to secede from the country. They aren't allowed to secede from the country. The federal units or the States have the right to break from the union in a real federation.

Explanation:

• India is not  a true federation. It blends the characteristics of a federal government with the characteristics of a unitary government and can also be considered non-federal characteristics.

• For this cause India is considered to be a semi-federal territory. Whereas it terms it "a quasi-federal territory." The Indian Supreme Court also defines it as "a federal system which has a clear bias against the Middle."

learn more about federation:

Is india federal or quasi federal?? ​

https://brainly.in/question/9395046