History, asked by jigmet4083, 1 year ago

why heritage is multidimensional concept​

Answers

Answered by madansingh0934
1

Answer:You could talk about a multidimensional book filled with indicate them plot, symbols or could even call a person ,and if she had a particular complicated personality .This is called heritage is multidimensional concept.

Explanation:

Answered by payalchatterje
0

Answer:

Heritage is multidimensional concept because the purpose of the work is to review critical issues related to the economic dimension of cultural heritage to show that tangible and intangible "cultural economic" goods and services offered by cultural institutions can be analyzed and valued in several fields. -dimensional, multi-attribute and multi-value socio-economic environment. This multidimensional and multi-attribute environment provides a conceptual framework for analyzing cultural services and cultural capital. The paper is speculative in nature, offering new avenues for evaluation and empirical investigation. The work is divided into three parts. The first section begins with a review of the merit literature, reexamining how different paradigms, both neoclassical and more unconventional, have addressed the problem, and assessing why and to what extent the merit good is a valid economic concept. The second part focuses on what role merit theory should play in cultural economics and, more specifically, how the mix of merit and benefits can be integrated into a theoretical and conceptual framework. Cultural resources should ideally be defined as a combination of shared advantages and benefits in a multidimensional scenario. Cultural capital provides and "produces" services and functions, providing private, public and dignified benefits (value). The multidimensional framework also includes a multiparadigmatic perspective that combines neoclassical and non-neoclassical elements. The last part summarizes and concludes that such a well-established conceptual framework shows and supports new ways of economic valuation of the cultural field and cultural institutions and policy making. The division of cultural activities into many services and functions allows analysis to focus on individual components of the "good" offered by cultural institutions and demanded by users. Valuing culture as a non-integral resource can contribute to economic analysis and decision-making processes. The main emerging results are:(i) the concept of value-value is relevant to cultural economics and cultural policy and represents a relevant ideal "metaphor" and an important dimension of values related to "cultural functions"; ii) the inclusion of merit goodness theory provides an opportunity to define cultural values and services as an effective example of multidimensional categorization of private, public, mixed and collective services, where different theoretical perspectives are integrated with each other as much as possible; (iii) because good theory is inherently situated in a dynamic and uncertain environment, it shows theoretically and politically that it is theoretically and politically necessary for mixed goods theory and policy at both the macroeconomic and microeconomic levels. A policy motivated by the theme of good merit should be aimed at ensuring the necessary collective material and non-material investments, on which the long-term impact of cultural policy is based; (iv) special attention should be paid to the study of "claims" related to cultural values, emphasizing the role of value analysis supported by the conceptual framework developed here. This article aims to serve as a point of reference for future research, generating some controversy and stimulating further contributions.

Dimensional related two more questions:

https://brainly.in/question/24791936

https://brainly.in/question/11445951

#SPJ3

Similar questions