Why is it important to maintain hierarchical stability in the military? Especially with large quantities of people? (200+words-paragraph)
Answers
Answer:
Hey mate,
Military rule, political regime in which the military as an organization holds a preponderance of power. The term military rule as used here is synonymous with military regimeand refers to a subtype of authoritarian regime.
Military rule
Political system
Armed force
For most of human history, attaching military to rule would have been redundant, because almost all political regimes in large-scale societies of the premodern period fused military, religious, economic, and monarchical power. The separation of military and civilian powers and the development of professional bureaucratic armed forces in European states in the 18th and 19th centuries gave birth to the contemporary understanding of military rule.
Not all authoritarian regimes involve military rule. In the 20th century the most-repressive nondemocratic regimes, most notably the Nazis in Germany and the Stalinist regime in the Soviet Union, were party dictatorships in which civilian control of the military was well established. Other types of authoritarian rule distinct from military rule include traditional (e.g., absolutist monarchies) and personalistic, or “sultanistic,” regimes.
Since the end of World War II, military rule has occurred almost exclusively in countries of the so-called developing world. Modernization theorists, influential in the 1950s and ’60s, were initially confident that the newly independent nations of the Middle East, Africa, and Asia (as well as Latin America) would evolve into capitalist democracies, with civilian control over the military. Those expectations were dashed by a wave of military coups d’état that reached its height in the 1960s and ’70s.
Get exclusive access to content from our 1768 First Edition with your subscription.Subscribe today
Origins Of Military Rule
Analyses of the circumstances that lead to the rise of military rule abound. Empirical studies suggest that there is no direct correlation between the size of the military or its budget and its propensity to seize power. Further, the reasons for hierarchical coups (led by the high command) tend to be different from those for coups led by junior officers (those with the rank of, or equivalent to, army captain or below). Rather more useful is the distinction between factors internal to the armed forces, domestic political variables, and international influences. In the first category, violations of military hierarchy by civilian politicians, an expansion of the military’s capacity or sense of mission, and a heightened sense of threat can all trigger coups. With regard to domestic politics, high degrees of political conflict (especially ethnic and religious conflict), economic crises, weak political parties (especially right-wing parties), and low-capacity state institutions have been observed to precede military takeovers. Significant in that category is also the image of the military in national politics and, in particular, the degree of popular identification of the military with certain positive national values. Internationally, the threat of or defeat in war, foreign political and military assistance, and an enabling international environment, including military rule in neighbouring countries and international recognition of military regimes, can facilitatecoups. A “cascade effect” has been observed in some regions, whereby military rule, first established in a single country, occurs elsewhere in subsequent years, leading to cooperation between military regimes. (For example, the 1964 coup in Brazilwas followed by a coup in Argentina in 1966, coups in Chileand Uruguay in 1973, and another coup in Argentina in 1976.)
Hope it will help u.
Plz like it and follow me to follow you back.
Plz mark me as brainliest plz haath jod ta hu.
┏━━━━•❅•°•❈ - •°•❅•━━━━┓
Here's your answer ⏎
┗━━━━•❅•°•❈ - •°•❅•━━━━┛
Leadership ✍
➽ Leadership is considered as a legacy that prepares others to carry on with courage and determination. True leadership is defined as the ability to inspire & persuade people to follow the right path . True leader creates a new leader and not the followers .A True leader speaks through his deeds and not through words.
☘Hope it helps❢❢
⊷⊷⊷⊷⊷⊷⊷⊷⊷⊷⊷⊷⊷⊷⊷⊷⊷⊷